"No margin, no mission” is a fair mantra. But in 2025, the public and policymakers are asking whether nonprofit health systems and health plans are truly earning the value of their tax preferences or if the “halo” has outpaced the community benefit delivered.

The Size of the Subsidy

The financial advantage of tax exemption for nonprofit hospitals is enormous:

$28.1 billion in 2020 (federal, state, and local combined)

$37.4 billion in 2021, more than half from state and local tax breaks

These subsidies lower the cost of capital, enabling expansion and acquisitions but, they don’t guarantee lower prices for patients or members.

The Give-Back Gap

Whether communities are getting a fair return depends on how “community benefit” is defined.

Lown Institute (2024): 80% of nonprofit hospitals spent less on financial assistance and community investment than the value of their tax breaks, creating a $25.7 billion “fair-share deficit” in 2021

AHA/EY (2020): Counting a broader basket (Medicaid shortfalls, training, research), community benefits are ~10x the value of the federal tax exemption

Critics argue that some categories counted as “benefit”, like underpayment from Medicaid, are more accurately cost-shifts, not voluntary community investment.

The Waste Problem

Waste is systemic and ownership form doesn’t inoculate against it.

U.S. healthcare waste is estimated at ~25% of total spending, across pricing failure, administrative complexity, low-value care, delivery failures, and fraud/abuse

Prices track market power, not tax status. Consolidation raises prices with limited quality improvement

Rules Without Results

IRS rules for nonprofit hospitals (501(r)) require:

A written financial assistance policy

Community health needs assessments every three years

Reporting of “community benefit” on Schedule H

But there is no national minimum charity care requirement, leaving wide variation between systems .

Nonprofit Health Plans: A Different Landscape

Not all nonprofit health plans enjoy blanket tax exemption:

Many Blue Cross Blue Shield plans are taxable under IRC §833 but get a special deduction if they maintain an 85% medical loss ratio (MLR)

Medicare Advantage gross margins per enrollee have remained well above group or individual lines - $1,982 per enrollee in 2023

Ownership form is not a reliable predictor of consumer price relief.

Implications for Health Plan Boards

If you’re contracting with nonprofit health systems, you should:

Stop paying “mission premiums.” Tie escalators to measurable community health outputs, not process measures.

Price the externalities of consolidation. Demand site-neutral rates, anti-steerage protections, and facility-fee controls.

Set charity-care floors. Require audited, minimum uncompensated-care spend as a condition for preferred network status.

Make community health contractual. Fund upstream initiatives (maternal health, behavioral health) with performance-based clawbacks.

Policy Ideas

National floor for charity care/community investment tied to tax benefit value.

Standardized accounting: Separate “true” community investment from teaching/research and shortfalls.

Condition property-tax relief on charity-care and medical-debt policies.

Tougher merger review with price caps and access guarantees.

Bottom Line

The data is clear: while many nonprofit hospitals and plans do valuable work, tax status alone doesn’t ensure equitable community return. Purchasers - especially health plans - can and should demand verifiable value for the public subsidy.

© Steve McGovern and Executive Search Insights, 2025. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to McGovern Executive Search with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

This article is preserved from the McGovern Executive Search Insights archive.

Return to the Insights archive →